Hi Izaak,
I think I misunderstood your question.
the fapl call is just setting properties (comm and info) to use when
accessing the file. And since the communicator and info object are
duplicated internally, you can do whatever you want in your program with
the the comm, or the info object after you set them in the fapl call. If
you reset those parameters in the fapl before opening the file, then you
will override them.
To open a new file with a different communicator, you will need to call
|H5Pset_fapl_mpio| with the new communicator on a new fapl_id for the
new file. so yes you will need a fapl for each file, if you are opening
multiple files at once with different communicators.
Hope this clears it up.
Mohamad
On 10/14/2011 08:49 AM, Zaak Beekman wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:39 AM, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
3) If I want to open and work with multiple files simultaneously,
using the same or different communicators, then the only way to
do this is to create one file access property list per file
using H5Pset_fapl_mpio, right? One does this instead of reusing
the same file access property list (if the communicator is the
same) or placing another call to H5Pset_fapl_mpio and passing in
the the old property list, but the new communicator (if the
communicator is different), correct? (If I am reading the
documentation correctly then opening multiple files with the same
access property list means that they will all use the same
communicator and messages may collide, alternatively if one uses
a new file-access-property list then each open file has a unique
communicator/communication context.)
If you want to change the communicator you opened the file with,
you need to reset it in the fapl then open the file with it;
otherwise if your communicator does not change, you can reuse the
fapl.
Does the library make a private copy of the communicator passed in
with H5Pset_fapl_mpio? If so, to operate on multiple files
*simultaneously* they should each have their own file-access-property
list so that they each have their own internal communicators, righ?
(Otherwise you could get communication collisions.) Or is opening
multiple files simulataneously not even possible in PHDF5?
-Izaak
_______________________________________________
Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
[email protected]
http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org
_______________________________________________
Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
[email protected]
http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org
