Elena,

I've reduced it to a single hdf5 file, which, when h5diff'ed with itself, 
produces output similar to below.

I will send the file to the address below.

Thanks,
Dave

On Jul 24, 2012, at 11:25 AM, Elena Pourmal wrote:

> Dave,
> 
> Could you please send your file to [email protected]? We will take a look.
> 
> On which system are you running the command?
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Elena
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Elena Pourmal  The HDF Group  http://hdfgroup.org   
> 1800 So. Oak St., Suite 203, Champaign IL 61820
> 217.531.6112
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 24, 2012, at 12:13 PM, Dave Wade-Stein wrote:
> 
>> I'm getting some output from h5diff which seems wrong.
>> 
>> [dws@oxygen02 history]$ /usr/local/contrib/hdf5-1.8.8-par/bin/h5diff -v -p 
>> 1e-30 ptclTrackTagFromAbsorber1s_HistoryOld.h5 
>> /scr1_oxygen/dws/jenkins/workspace/vorpalall-build/qarnodes/oxygen/vptests/vpresults-oxygen/history/ptclTrackTagFromAbsorber1s/ptclTrackTagFromAbsorber1s_HistoryOld.h5
>>  /trajectory
>> dataset: </trajectory> and </trajectory>
>> size:           [339x7x6]           [339x7x6]
>> position        trajectory      trajectory      difference      relative     
>>   
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> [ 0 1 0 ]          1.678294506e+243 0               1.678294506e+243 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 1 1 ]          9.047791808e+164 0               9.047791808e+164 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 1 2 ]          4.78541875e+175 0               4.78541875e+175 1         
>>     
>> [ 0 1 3 ]          4.440349806e-38 0               4.440349806e-38 1         
>>     
>> [ 0 1 4 ]          4.545801862e+97 0               4.545801862e+97 1         
>>     
>> [ 0 1 5 ]          8.535925984e-307 0               8.535925984e-307 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 2 0 ]          3.952525167e-322 0               3.952525167e-322 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 2 1 ]          3.119382268e-319 0               3.119382268e-319 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 2 2 ]          9.698666729e-317 0               9.698666729e-317 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 2 3 ]          6.920039978e-310 0               6.920039978e-310 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 2 4 ]          4.193339982e+228 0               4.193339982e+228 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 2 5 ]          1.129002081e+277 0               1.129002081e+277 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 3 0 ]          1.355073239e+248 0               1.355073239e+248 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 3 2 ]          3.162020133e-322 0               3.162020133e-322 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 3 3 ]          3.162020133e-322 0               3.162020133e-322 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 3 5 ]          2.60988666e+180 0               2.60988666e+180 1         
>>     
>> [ 0 4 0 ]          4.193339982e+228 0               4.193339982e+228 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 4 1 ]          1.129002081e+277 0               1.129002081e+277 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 4 2 ]          1.355073239e+248 0               1.355073239e+248 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 4 5 ]          3.113058228e-319 0               3.113058228e-319 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 5 0 ]          4.824065618e+228 0               4.824065618e+228 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 5 1 ]          2.60988666e+180 0               2.60988666e+180 1         
>>     
>> [ 0 5 2 ]          4.193339982e+228 0               4.193339982e+228 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 5 3 ]          1.129002081e+277 0               1.129002081e+277 1       
>>       
>> [ 0 5 4 ]          1.355073239e+248 0               1.355073239e+248 1       
>>       
>> 
>> The diffs says that element (0,1,0) of the /trajectory dataset is  
>> 1.678294506e+243 (in bold above), but when I use h5dump to look at the 
>> dataset, I see 0s:
>> 
>> ...
>>  DATASET "trajectory" {
>>       DATATYPE  H5T_IEEE_F64LE
>>       DATASPACE  SIMPLE { ( 339, 7, 6 ) / ( H5S_UNLIMITED, H5S_UNLIMITED, 
>> H5S_UNLIMITED ) }
>>       DATA {
>>       (0,0,0): 1.09772e-05, 1.007e+12, 0, 0, 8, 0,
>>       (0,1,0): 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
>>       (0,2,0): 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
>>       (0,3,0): 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
>>       (0,4,0): 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
>>       (0,5,0): 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
>>       (0,6,0): 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
>>       (1,0,0): 1.10752e-05, 1.00993e+12, 0, 0, 8, 0,
>>       (1,1,0): 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
>>       (1,2,0): 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
>>       (1,3,0): 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
>>       (1,4,0): 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
>>       (1,5,0): 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
>>       (1,6,0): 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
>> ...
>> 
>> Any ideas what's going on here. The datatype in both files is 
>> H5T_IEEE_F64LE, so I know this is not a datatype comparison issue.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Dave

\




_______________________________________________
Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
[email protected]
http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org

Reply via email to