Yeah, I meant ‘kill -9’ not ctrl-C. I would expect ctrl-C to just abort the 
current command (e.g. ‘make check’). By killing the running process (lt-btree) 
alone, make check would just interpret that as some kind of failure and then 
move on to the next test.

Yes, you need a “true” parallel filesystem for any parallel tests. NFS will NOT 
work.

Running on /local makes a lot of sense other than for parallel. Whenever I run 
on NFS, things take a lot longer due to all the contention for that shared 
resource.

Mark




From: Hdf-forum 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 on behalf of Prentice Bisbal <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: HDF Users Discussion List 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, July 25, 2016 at 1:22 PM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [Hdf-forum] How long should 'make check' take?


Where (e.g. on which kind of filesystem) are you trying to run ‘make check’?

Can you kill -9 that one process and see if it proceeds to completion on 
remaining tests?

Since I'm working on a serial build, right now, I'm using scratch disk local to 
the node I'm doing my builds on, mounted as '/local' When I do a control-C, the 
whole 'make check' process appears to end, it doesn't go on to the next test.

I'm now doing a build with minimal options specified in the configure step to 
see if maybe combinations of options was causing the problem.

For parallel tests, you *should* be using a parallel fileystem. I frequently 
forget about that.

Do you mean a shared filesystem, like NFS, or a true parallel filesystem like 
Lustre or GPFS? After realizing my stupidity of trying to do the parallel make 
check on my local disk, I did move it to an NFS filesystem.

Prentice

On 07/25/2016 04:07 PM, Miller, Mark C. wrote:
30+mins *does* seem a bit long.

Typically, a ‘make check’ for me completes *all* tests in a total of about 
10-15 mins at the most.

Where (e.g. on which kind of filesystem) are you trying to run ‘make check’?

For parallel tests, you *should* be using a parallel fileystem. I frequently 
forget about that.

If the parallel filesystem is *extremely* busy and/or not setup to deal with 
small I/Os and/or files (as the tests generate), I could see there being *some* 
additional delay in completion.

The btree test I think is testing HDF5’s internal btree data structures for 
group objects. So, if its doing any I/O I think its a bunch of tiny HDF5 
metadata stuff.

Can you kill -9 that one process and see if it proceeds to completion on 
remaining tests?

Mark


From: Hdf-forum 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 on behalf of Prentice Bisbal <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: HDF Users Discussion List 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, July 25, 2016 at 12:59 PM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [Hdf-forum] How long should 'make check' take?

How long should make check normally take to run for a serial build?
After 'make check' was hanging for me at testphdf5 when building HDF5
with parallel support, make check now seems to be hanging when testing
btree2. It's been at the same spot for 30 minutes or more, but this
time, I see the process (lt-btree2) using CPU and memory in top, just
not much of it. Is this normal? I would expect file I/O tests to only
take a few minutes, not 30+ minutes.

--
Prentice


_______________________________________________
Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_lists.hdfgroup.org
Twitter: https://twitter.com/hdf5




_______________________________________________
Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>http://lists.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_lists.hdfgroup.org
Twitter: https://twitter.com/hdf5

_______________________________________________
Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
[email protected]
http://lists.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_lists.hdfgroup.org
Twitter: https://twitter.com/hdf5

Reply via email to