On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Cosmin Lehene <cleh...@adobe.com> wrote:
> HDFS-909 left us with a corrupted HDFS > > Given there isn't yet a patch against branch-20 for HDFS-909, I don't think we should block a release for it. There's nothing preventing us from releasing 0.20.3 later. -Todd > > > On 1/28/10 4:14 AM, "Andrew Purtell" <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > > > So the list of HDFS issues for next 0.20.x or 0.21 most relevant to HBase > > stability I have is: > > > > 127 > > 200 (well, hflush) > > 630 > > 793 > > > > > > Sound about right? Anything important I'm missing? > > > > - Andy > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > >> From: Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> > >> To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org > >> Sent: Thu, January 28, 2010 9:14:01 AM > >> Subject: Re: Rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2 > >> > >> I don't think 101 is a real blocker - I haven't been able to reliably > >> produce it. HDFS-793 fixes most of the issues I've seen in practice, and > we > >> now have a new patch in branch-20 which should fix that. > >> > >> 127 would be nice - there's a patch on that JIRA waiting for review as > >> below. > >> > >> -Todd > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Stack wrote: > >> > >>> If the new release included (fixedup) hdfs-127 and hdfs-101, the hbase > >>> crew would be big fans of an hadoop 0.20.2. > >>> St.Ack > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > >>>> HDFS-127 was originally committed, then rolled back from 0.20 as it > >>> caused > >>>> test timeouts due to infinite loop. I put a new patch up there but it > has > >>>> not been reviewed, and thus not committed. > >>>> > >>>> Owen: is there a particular rush for 0.20.2 or can we hold out for > these > >>>> patches? > >>>> > >>>> -Todd > >>>> > >>>> 2010/1/26 Kay Kay > >>>> > >>>>> Is HDFS-127 going to be part of it ? (seems to have been committed > as > >>> per > >>>>> the jira). > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 1/26/10 6:53 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> +1 > >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 09:56AM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'm planning on rolling a Hadoop 0.20.2 today. Are there any > blockers > >>>>>>> that can't wait? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- Owen > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >
