Thanks, Harsh. Any issues you see if we use this? I've already done some researches of this approach. However i am NOT sure if there has some potential risks if we use VIP (i am NOT a seasoned hadooper :) )
regards macf On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Harsh J <qwertyman...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is a good approach, is used by many to mask the NameNode address > for the DataNodes; and is also good to use while using BackupNode > (Even Facebook does this). > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:38 AM, mac fang <mac.had...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, guys, > > > > Do we have any plan to enable VIP between NameNode and DataNodes, I mean > > multiple NameNodes and we use a VIP stands before the NNs. Then DNs only > > need to connect to the VIP. I don't know if it is valuable we have this > impl > > in our hdsf and if there has any issues? > > > > Any hints are valuable for me. :) > > > > regards > > macf > > > > > > -- > Harsh J > www.harshj.com >
