On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Doug Cutting <cutt...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 10/03/2011 02:50 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > 2) Move the branch itself into some kind of attic/ directory > > We might: > 1. Let it lie, alongside other dead branches like branch-0.1, etc. > 2. Create a directory for dead branches and move all of the dead > branches there. > 3. Remove all dead branches. > > I'd suggest we do (1) for now, and separately address the issue of dead > branches. > > While removed branches are still retrievable they're harder to find and > removing them doesn't save space. So if we find that the branches > directory is too cluttered then an archive directory might be useful. > I've seen some other projects do that, while many don't seem to bother. > +1 > > Doug > -- "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling. - Bjarne Stroustrup http://www.jeffmaury.com http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury
