+1 Since no one is objecting, I will merge HDFS-744 to 2.0.
For 1.x, it needs more thoughts because it is likely to be an incompatible change. Tsz-Wo ________________________________ From: Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org Cc: lars hofhansl <lhofha...@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, June 1, 2012 10:04 AM Subject: Re: hsync in hadoop 2.0? +1, it's protocol-compatible, I don't see any reason not to put it in 2.0.x. On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 for 2.0 > > For those trying to stabilize that for deployment early next year, commit > of this only to trunk won't help as much, though a private backport could > happen in that case. > > - Andy > > On Friday, June 1, 2012, lars hofhansl wrote: > >> HDFS-744 adds support for true durable sync for DFSOutputStream.hsync(). >> This is useful for HBase (among others) and I created a matching patch in >> HBASE-5954. >> >> I would like to port this back into Hadoop 2.0 and maybe even 1.0. >> A 2.0 patch is already attached to HDFS-744. (The 1.0 patch would be quite >> different, but the underlying implementation would be the same) >> >> >> If I understand correctly Hadoop 2.0 is not out of alpha, yet. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -- Lars >> > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
