I think that using "-(alpha,beta)" tags on the release versions is a really bad idea. All releases should follow the strictly numeric (Major.Minor.Patch) pattern that we've used for all of the releases except the 2.0.x ones.
-- Owen On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> > wrote: > > > Would it better to have 2.0.3-alpha, 2.0.4-beta and then make 2.1 as a > > stable release? This way we just have one series (2.0.x) which is not > > suitable for general consumption. > > > > > > That contains the versioning damage to the 2.0.x set. This is an > improvement over the original proposal where we let the versioning mayhem > run out 2.3. > > Thanks Arun, > St.Ack >
