> What's in branch-2.4.1 doesn't currently match what's in this RC, but there is a tag that matches, right? Else we need to fix that.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Aaron T. Myers <a...@cloudera.com> wrote: > That's fine by me. Like I said, assuming that rc1 does indeed include the > fix in HDFS-6527, and not the revert, then rc1 should be functionally > correct. What's in branch-2.4.1 doesn't currently match what's in this RC, > but if that doesn't bother anyone else then I won't lose any sleep over it. > > -- > Aaron T. Myers > Software Engineer, Cloudera > > > On Jun 27, 2014, at 3:04 PM, "Arun C. Murthy" <a...@hortonworks.com> > wrote: > > > > Aaron, > > > > Since the amend was just to the test, I'll keep this RC as-is. > > > > I'll also comment on jira. > > > > thanks, > > Arun > > > > > > > >> On Jun 27, 2014, at 2:40 PM, "Aaron T. Myers" <a...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >> > >> I'm -0 on rc1. > >> > >> Note the latest discussion on HDFS-6527 which first resulted in that > patch > >> being reverted from branch-2.4.1 because it was believed it wasn't > >> necessary, and then some more discussion which indicates that in fact > the > >> patch for HDFS-6527 should be included in 2.4.1, but with a slightly > >> different test case. > >> > >> I believe that rc1 was actually created after the first backport of > >> HDFS-6527, but before the revert, so rc1 should be functionally correct, > >> but the test case is not quite correct in rc1, and I believe that rc1 > does > >> not currently reflect the actual tip of branch-2.4.1. I'm not going to > >> consider this a deal-breaker, but seems like we should probably clean > it up. > >> > >> To get this all sorted out properly, if we wanted to, I believe we > should > >> do another backport of HDFS-6527 to branch-2.4.1 including only the > amended > >> test case, and create a new RC from that point. > >> > >> Best, > >> Aaron > >> > >> -- > >> Aaron T. Myers > >> Software Engineer, Cloudera > >> > >> > >>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> Folks, > >>> > >>> I've created another release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.4.1 based on > the > >>> feedback that I would like to push out. > >>> > >>> The RC is available at: > >>> http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.4.1-rc1 > >>> The RC tag in svn is here: > >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.4.1-rc1 > >>> > >>> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org. > >>> > >>> Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 > days. > >>> > >>> thanks, > >>> Arun > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Arun C. Murthy > >>> Hortonworks Inc. > >>> http://hortonworks.com/hdp/ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > >>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or > entity to > >>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > >>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the > reader > >>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified > that > >>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > >>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > >>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender > immediately > >>> and delete it from your system. Thank You. > > > > -- > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity > to > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified > that > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender > immediately > > and delete it from your system. Thank You. > -- Alejandro
