Hi Suresh

There was one vote thread on whether to migrate to git, and the
implications to the commit process for individual patches and feature
branches -
https://www.mail-archive.com/common-dev@hadoop.apache.org/msg13447.html .
Prior to that, there was a discuss thread on the same topic.

As INFRA handles the actual migration from subversion to git, the vote
didn't include those specifics. The migration is going on as we speak (See
INFRA-8195). The initial expectation was that the migration would be done
in a few hours, but it has been several hours and the last I heard the
import was still running.

I have elaborated on the points in the vote thread and drafted up a wiki
page on how-to-commit - https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToCommitWithGit .
We can work on improving this further and call a vote thread on those items
if need be.

Thanks
Karthik


On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Suresh Srinivas <sur...@hortonworks.com>
wrote:

> Karthik,
>
> I would like to see detailed information on how this migration will be
> done, how it will affect the existing project and commit process. This
> should be done in a document that can be reviewed instead of in an email
> thread on an ad-hoc basis. Was there any voting on this in PMC and should
> we have a vote to ensure everyone is one the same page on doing this and
> how to go about it?
>
> Regards,
> Suresh
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Last I heard, the import is still going on and appears closer to getting
> > done. Thanks for your patience with the migration.
> >
> > I ll update you as and when there is something. Eventually, the git repo
> > should be at the location in the wiki.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for bringing these points up, Zhijie.
> > >
> > > By the way, a revised How-to-commit wiki is at:
> > > https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToCommitWithGit . Please feel free
> to
> > > make changes and improve it.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Zhijie Shen <zs...@hortonworks.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Do we have any convention about "user.name" and "user.email"? For
> > >> example,
> > >> we'd like to use @apache.org for the email.
> > >>
> > >
> > > May be, we can ask people to use project-specific configs here and use
> > > their real name and @apache.org address.
> > >
> > > Is there any downside to letting people use their global values for
> these
> > > configs?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Moreover, do we want to use "--author="Author Name <em...@address.com
> >"
> > >> when committing on behalf of a particular contributor?
> > >>
> > >
> > > Fetching the email-address is complicated here. Should we use the
> > > contributor's email from JIRA? What if that is not their @apache
> address?
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Thanks for your input, Steve. Sorry for sending the email out that
> > >> late, I
> > >> > sent it as soon as I could.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Steve Loughran <
> > ste...@hortonworks.com
> > >> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > just caught up with this after some offlininess...15:48 PST is too
> > >> late
> > >> > for
> > >> > > me.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I'd be -1 to a change to "master" because of that risk that it
> does
> > >> break
> > >> > > existing code -especially people that have trunk off the git
> mirrors
> > >> and
> > >> > > automated builds/merges to go with it.
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> > Fair enough. It makes sense to leave it as "trunk", unless someone
> is
> > >> > against it being trunk.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > "master" may be viewed as the official git way, but it doesn't
> have
> > to
> > >> > be.
> > >> > > For git-flow workflows (which we use in slider) master/ is for
> > >> releases,
> > >> > > develop/ for dev.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 24 August 2014 02:31, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Couple of things:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > 1. Since no one expressed any reservations against doing this on
> > >> Sunday
> > >> > > or
> > >> > > > renaming trunk to master, I ll go ahead and confirm that. I
> think
> > >> that
> > >> > > > serves us better in the long run.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > 2. Arpit brought up the precommit builds - we should definitely
> > fix
> > >> > them
> > >> > > as
> > >> > > > soon as we can. I understand Giri maintains those builds, do we
> > have
> > >> > > anyone
> > >> > > > else who has access in case Giri is not reachable? Giri - please
> > >> shout
> > >> > > out
> > >> > > > if you can help us with this either on Sunday or Monday.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Thanks
> > >> > > > Karthik
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Karthik Kambatla <
> > >> ka...@cloudera.com>
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Also, does anyone know what we use for integration between
> JIRA
> > >> and
> > >> > > svn?
> > >> > > > I
> > >> > > > > am assuming svn2jira.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Karthik Kambatla <
> > >> > ka...@cloudera.com>
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >> Hi folks,
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> For the SCM migration, feel free to follow
> > >> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8195
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> Most of this is planned to be handled this Sunday. As a
> result,
> > >> the
> > >> > > > >> subversion repository would be read-only. If this is a major
> > >> issue
> > >> > for
> > >> > > > you,
> > >> > > > >> please shout out.
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> Daniel Gruno, the one helping us with the migration, was
> asking
> > >> if
> > >> > we
> > >> > > > are
> > >> > > > >> open to renaming "trunk" to "master" to better conform to git
> > >> > lingo. I
> > >> > > > am
> > >> > > > >> tempted to say yes, but wanted to check.
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> Would greatly appreciate any help with checking the git repo
> > has
> > >> > > > >> everything.
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >> Thanks
> > >> > > > >> Karthik
> > >> > > > >>
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > >> > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> > >> entity
> > >> > to
> > >> > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> > >> confidential,
> > >> > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> > >> reader
> > >> > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> > notified
> > >> > that
> > >> > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > >> > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> have
> > >> > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > >> > immediately
> > >> > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Zhijie Shen
> > >> Hortonworks Inc.
> > >> http://hortonworks.com/
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > >> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity
> > >> to
> > >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> confidential,
> > >> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> > reader
> > >> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> > >> that
> > >> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > >> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > >> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > >> immediately
> > >> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://hortonworks.com/download/
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>

Reply via email to