I have simulated the problem in my env and verified that, both 'git clean
-xdf' and 'mvn clean' will not remove the directory.
mvn fails where as git simply ignores (not even display any warning) the
problem.



Regards,
Vinay

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Can someone point me to an example build that is broken?
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm on it. HADOOP-11721
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Haohui Mai <whe...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 for git clean.
> >>
> >> Colin, can you please get it in ASAP? Currently due to the jenkins
> >> issues, we cannot close the 2.7 blockers.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Haohui
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Colin P. McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > If all it takes is someone creating a test that makes a directory
> >> > without -x, this is going to happen over and over.
> >> >
> >> > Let's just fix the problem at the root by running "git clean -fqdx" in
> >> > our jenkins scripts.  If there's no objections I will add this in and
> >> > un-break the builds.
> >> >
> >> > best,
> >> > Colin
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Lei Xu <l...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >> >> I filed HDFS-7917 to change the way to simulate disk failures.
> >> >>
> >> >> But I think we still need infrastructure folks to help with jenkins
> >> >> scripts to clean the dirs left today.
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Mai Haohui <ricet...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>> Any updates on this issues? It seems that all HDFS jenkins builds
> are
> >> >>> still failing.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Regards,
> >> >>> Haohui
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Vinayakumar B <
> >> vinayakum...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >>>> I think the problem started from here.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/9828/testReport/junit/org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode/TestDataNodeVolumeFailure/testUnderReplicationAfterVolFailure/
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> As Chris mentioned TestDataNodeVolumeFailure is changing the
> >> permission.
> >> >>>> But in this patch, ReplicationMonitor got NPE and it got terminate
> >> signal,
> >> >>>> due to which MiniDFSCluster.shutdown() throwing Exception.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> But, TestDataNodeVolumeFailure#teardown() is restoring those
> >> permission
> >> >>>> after shutting down cluster. So in this case IMO, permissions were
> >> never
> >> >>>> restored.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>   @After
> >> >>>>   public void tearDown() throws Exception {
> >> >>>>     if(data_fail != null) {
> >> >>>>       FileUtil.setWritable(data_fail, true);
> >> >>>>     }
> >> >>>>     if(failedDir != null) {
> >> >>>>       FileUtil.setWritable(failedDir, true);
> >> >>>>     }
> >> >>>>     if(cluster != null) {
> >> >>>>       cluster.shutdown();
> >> >>>>     }
> >> >>>>     for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> >> >>>>       FileUtil.setExecutable(new File(dataDir, "data"+(2*i+1)),
> >> true);
> >> >>>>       FileUtil.setExecutable(new File(dataDir, "data"+(2*i+2)),
> >> true);
> >> >>>>     }
> >> >>>>   }
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Regards,
> >> >>>> Vinay
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Vinayakumar B <
> >> vinayakum...@apache.org>
> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> When I see the history of these kind of builds, All these are
> >> failed on
> >> >>>>> node H9.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> I think some or the other uncommitted patch would have created the
> >> problem
> >> >>>>> and left it there.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Regards,
> >> >>>>> Vinay
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> You could rely on a destructive git clean call instead of maven
> to
> >> do the
> >> >>>>>> directory removal.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>> Sean
> >> >>>>>> On Mar 11, 2015 4:11 PM, "Colin McCabe" <cmcc...@alumni.cmu.edu>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> > Is there a maven plugin or setting we can use to simply remove
> >> >>>>>> > directories that have no executable permissions on them?
> >> Clearly we
> >> >>>>>> > have the permission to do this from a technical point of view
> >> (since
> >> >>>>>> > we created the directories as the jenkins user), it's simply
> >> that the
> >> >>>>>> > code refuses to do it.
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> > Otherwise I guess we can just fix those tests...
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> > Colin
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Lei Xu <l...@cloudera.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>>> > > Thanks a lot for looking into HDFS-7722, Chris.
> >> >>>>>> > >
> >> >>>>>> > > In HDFS-7722:
> >> >>>>>> > > TestDataNodeVolumeFailureXXX tests reset data dir permissions
> >> in
> >> >>>>>> > TearDown().
> >> >>>>>> > > TestDataNodeHotSwapVolumes reset permissions in a finally
> >> clause.
> >> >>>>>> > >
> >> >>>>>> > > Also I ran mvn test several times on my machine and all tests
> >> passed.
> >> >>>>>> > >
> >> >>>>>> > > However, since in DiskChecker#checkDirAccess():
> >> >>>>>> > >
> >> >>>>>> > > private static void checkDirAccess(File dir) throws
> >> >>>>>> DiskErrorException {
> >> >>>>>> > >   if (!dir.isDirectory()) {
> >> >>>>>> > >     throw new DiskErrorException("Not a directory: "
> >> >>>>>> > >                                  + dir.toString());
> >> >>>>>> > >   }
> >> >>>>>> > >
> >> >>>>>> > >   checkAccessByFileMethods(dir);
> >> >>>>>> > > }
> >> >>>>>> > >
> >> >>>>>> > > One potentially safer alternative is replacing data dir with
> a
> >> regular
> >> >>>>>> > > file to stimulate disk failures.
> >> >>>>>> > >
> >> >>>>>> > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Chris Nauroth <
> >> >>>>>> cnaur...@hortonworks.com>
> >> >>>>>> > wrote:
> >> >>>>>> > >> TestDataNodeHotSwapVolumes, TestDataNodeVolumeFailure,
> >> >>>>>> > >> TestDataNodeVolumeFailureReporting, and
> >> >>>>>> > >> TestDataNodeVolumeFailureToleration all remove executable
> >> permissions
> >> >>>>>> > from
> >> >>>>>> > >> directories like the one Colin mentioned to simulate disk
> >> failures at
> >> >>>>>> > data
> >> >>>>>> > >> nodes.  I reviewed the code for all of those, and they all
> >> appear to
> >> >>>>>> be
> >> >>>>>> > >> doing the necessary work to restore executable permissions
> at
> >> the
> >> >>>>>> end of
> >> >>>>>> > >> the test.  The only recent uncommitted patch I¹ve seen that
> >> makes
> >> >>>>>> > changes
> >> >>>>>> > >> in these test suites is HDFS-7722.  That patch still looks
> >> fine
> >> >>>>>> > though.  I
> >> >>>>>> > >> don¹t know if there are other uncommitted patches that
> >> changed these
> >> >>>>>> > test
> >> >>>>>> > >> suites.
> >> >>>>>> > >>
> >> >>>>>> > >> I suppose it¹s also possible that the JUnit process
> >> unexpectedly died
> >> >>>>>> > >> after removing executable permissions but before restoring
> >> them.
> >> >>>>>> That
> >> >>>>>> > >> always would have been a weakness of these test suites,
> >> regardless of
> >> >>>>>> > any
> >> >>>>>> > >> recent changes.
> >> >>>>>> > >>
> >> >>>>>> > >> Chris Nauroth
> >> >>>>>> > >> Hortonworks
> >> >>>>>> > >> http://hortonworks.com/
> >> >>>>>> > >>
> >> >>>>>> > >>
> >> >>>>>> > >>
> >> >>>>>> > >>
> >> >>>>>> > >>
> >> >>>>>> > >>
> >> >>>>>> > >> On 3/10/15, 1:47 PM, "Aaron T. Myers" <a...@cloudera.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>>> > >>
> >> >>>>>> > >>>Hey Colin,
> >> >>>>>> > >>>
> >> >>>>>> > >>>I asked Andrew Bayer, who works with Apache Infra, what's
> >> going on
> >> >>>>>> with
> >> >>>>>> > >>>these boxes. He took a look and concluded that some perms
> are
> >> being
> >> >>>>>> set
> >> >>>>>> > in
> >> >>>>>> > >>>those directories by our unit tests which are precluding
> >> those files
> >> >>>>>> > from
> >> >>>>>> > >>>getting deleted. He's going to clean up the boxes for us,
> but
> >> we
> >> >>>>>> should
> >> >>>>>> > >>>expect this to keep happening until we can fix the test in
> >> question
> >> >>>>>> to
> >> >>>>>> > >>>properly clean up after itself.
> >> >>>>>> > >>>
> >> >>>>>> > >>>To help narrow down which commit it was that started this,
> >> Andrew
> >> >>>>>> sent
> >> >>>>>> > me
> >> >>>>>> > >>>this info:
> >> >>>>>> > >>>
> >> >>>>>> > >>>"/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HDFS-
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>>
> >>
> >>>Build/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/target/test/data/dfs/data/data3/
> >> >>>>>> > has
> >> >>>>>> > >>>500 perms, so I'm guessing that's the problem. Been that way
> >> since
> >> >>>>>> 9:32
> >> >>>>>> > >>>UTC
> >> >>>>>> > >>>on March 5th."
> >> >>>>>> > >>>
> >> >>>>>> > >>>--
> >> >>>>>> > >>>Aaron T. Myers
> >> >>>>>> > >>>Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >> >>>>>> > >>>
> >> >>>>>> > >>>On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Colin P. McCabe <
> >> cmcc...@apache.org
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> > >>>wrote:
> >> >>>>>> > >>>
> >> >>>>>> > >>>> Hi all,
> >> >>>>>> > >>>>
> >> >>>>>> > >>>> A very quick (and not thorough) survey shows that I can't
> >> find any
> >> >>>>>> > >>>> jenkins jobs that succeeded from the last 24 hours.  Most
> >> of them
> >> >>>>>> seem
> >> >>>>>> > >>>> to be failing with some variant of this message:
> >> >>>>>> > >>>>
> >> >>>>>> > >>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> >> >>>>>> > >>>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean
> >> >>>>>> (default-clean)
> >> >>>>>> > >>>> on project hadoop-hdfs: Failed to clean project: Failed to
> >> delete
> >> >>>>>> > >>>>
> >> >>>>>> > >>>>
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>>
> >>
> >>>>/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/hadoop-hdfs-pr
> >> >>>>>> > >>>>oject/hadoop-hdfs/target/test/data/dfs/data/data3
> >> >>>>>> > >>>> -> [Help 1]
> >> >>>>>> > >>>>
> >> >>>>>> > >>>> Any ideas how this happened?  Bad disk, unit test setting
> >> wrong
> >> >>>>>> > >>>> permissions?
> >> >>>>>> > >>>>
> >> >>>>>> > >>>> Colin
> >> >>>>>> > >>>>
> >> >>>>>> > >>
> >> >>>>>> > >
> >> >>>>>> > >
> >> >>>>>> > >
> >> >>>>>> > > --
> >> >>>>>> > > Lei (Eddy) Xu
> >> >>>>>> > > Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >> >>>>>> >
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Lei (Eddy) Xu
> >> >> Software Engineer, Cloudera
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sean
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sean
>

Reply via email to