There's a couple of S3a fixes coming along which could go into a 2.7.1; they've been held back to avoid rushing them in to 2.7.0 last-minute.
> On 9 Apr 2015, at 20:33, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > +1 (non-binding). > The plan sounds reasonable. We should make our release train more > fast-moving, and predictable - it could benefit our community and ecosystem > in many aspects. > > Thanks, > > Junping > ________________________________________ > From: Arpit Agarwal <aagar...@hortonworks.com> > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 8:23 PM > To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; common-...@hadoop.apache.org; > yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org > Cc: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli > Subject: Re: A 2.7.1 release to follow up 2.7.0 > > +1 for 2.7.1 and +1 for promoting it to 'stable', assuming it includes no new > features or gratuitous improvements. > > > > > Arpit > > > On 4/9/15, 11:48 AM, "Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli" <vino...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I feel like we haven't done a great job of maintaining the previous 2.x >> releases. Seeing as how long 2.7.0 release has taken, I am sure we will >> spend more time stabilizing it, fixing issues etc. >> >> I propose that we immediately follow up 2.7.0 with a 2.7.1 within 2-3 >> weeks. The focus obviously is to have blocker issues, bug-fixes and *no* >> features. Improvements are going to be slightly hard to reason about, but I >> propose limiting ourselves to very small improvements, if at all. >> >> The other area of concern with the previous releases had been >> compatibility. With help from Li Lu, I got jdiff reinstated in branch-2 >> (though patches are not yet in), and did a pass. In the unavoidable event >> that we find incompatibilities with 2.7.0, we can fix those in 2.7.1 and >> promote that to be the stable release. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Thanks,+Vinod
