> I assume you are targetting this only at trunk / 3.0 based on the "target > version" and the incompatibility discussion?
Yes, you're right. Best regards, - Tsuyoshi On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:12 AM, Colin P. McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote: > Looks like a good idea. I assume you are targetting this only at trunk / > 3.0 based on the "target version" and the incompatibility discussion? > > best, > Colin > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <oz...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi Steve, >> >> Thanks for your help. >> >> > 2. it's "significant" >> >> This change includes upgrading not only Jersey, but also its >> dependencies like grizzly, asm, and so on. >> >> > I'll try to rebuild a YARN app (slider) with the patch to see how it >> fares >> >> It helps us a lot. I'd like to suggest that the incompatibility >> clarified here be described on release note of jira(HADOOP-9613). >> >> - Tsuyoshi >> >> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Steve Loughran <ste...@hortonworks.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9613 covers the issue of >> updating Jersey to 3.0 to cope with the move to Java 8 >> > >> > 1. this is trunk >> > 2. it's "significant" >> > >> > we've been frozen on an old version of Jersey with issues, known ones >> needing separate threads to detect jersey startup failures, and putting off >> the Update-Jersey issue for 2- years. >> > >> > For Java 8 there's no choice but to move on. >> > >> > thoughts and comments on the JIRA please. I'll try to rebuild a YARN app >> (slider) with the patch to see how it fares >> > >> > >>
