Vinod, are you Ok with me putting it into 2.7.2?

Cos

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 01:25PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli wrote:
> I think we should get it in, I am still stuck on a couple of HDFS patches.
> 
> But I was not sure overall if the patch was right. Commented on the JIRA 
> regarding the same.
> 
> Thanks
> +Vinod
> 
> > On Nov 27, 2015, at 1:54 AM, Steve Loughran <ste...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > 
> > well, I'm not going to block it...it doesn't add anything more to the pom 
> > dependencies that aren't there right now
> > 
> >> On 26 Nov 2015, at 18:51, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 01:51PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> On 25 Nov 2015, at 02:48, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> Vinod, hopefully it isn't too late for a quick fix to be included into 
> >>>> 2.7.2
> >>>> (sorry for jumping too late on this train). The JIRA in question is
> >>>> HADOOP-12415 and I have committed it to trunk and branch-2 already.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Please let me know if this is still Ok to add into 2.7.2 as it seems to 
> >>>> be
> >>>> going through a respin. Thanks in advance,
> >>>> 
> >>>> Cos
> >>>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> can you hold it off until 2.7.3? 2.7.2 was tested and we shoudn't be 
> >>> making
> >>> more changes now, even if its just to the POMs
> >> 
> >> It's up to you guys, the fix is small but pretty critical IMO. The change 
> >> in
> >> question is literally breaking the build from the get go. In Bigtop we had 
> >> to
> >> patch 2.7.1 so we at least can build it into the stack. 
> >> 
> >> For the users using official release tarball it won't simply work unless 
> >> they
> >> are going to patch it themselves.
> >> 
> >> Cos
> > 
> > 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to