+ Rakesh and Uma Rakesh and Uma might have a better idea on this. I think Huawei was using it when Rakesh and Uma worked there.
- Sijie On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Chris Nauroth <cnaur...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > I recommend including the BookKeeper community in this discussion. I’ve > added their user@ and dev@ lists to this thread. > > I do not see BKJM being used in practice. Removing it from trunk would be > attractive in terms of less code for Hadoop to maintain and build, but if > we find existing users that want to keep it, I wouldn’t object. > > --Chris Nauroth > > On 7/26/16, 11:14 PM, "Vinayakumar B" <vinayakumar...@huawei.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > BKJM was Active and made much stable when the NameNode HA was > implemented and there was no QJM implemented. > Now QJM is present and is much stable which is adopted by many > production environment. > I wonder whether it would be a good time to retire BKJM from trunk? > > Are there any users of BKJM exists? > > -Vinay > > >
