Thanks Vinay and Ravi for reply.
Yes, since branch-1 behavior is same. Would like to know whether it’s
If it is not intended, Shall I raise Jira and remove this permission checks..?
--Brahma Reddy Battula
From: Ravi Prakash [mailto:ravihad...@gmail.com]
Sent: 09 August 2017 07:38
To: Vinayakumar B
Cc: Brahma Reddy Battula; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: Re: When permission is disabled, why setOwner() && setPermission()
still check the permission?
I agree! I don't know of any one who doesn't use permissions. This was probably
a feature flag that never got removed.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 3:29 AM, Vinayakumar B
Thanks for bringing this up.
According to history of git, there is no historical reasons found for me.
May be someone with branch-1 experience, can answer this ..?
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula <
> Hi All
> why the "dfs.permissions.enabled" flag was not considered for this
> setOwner() and setPermission() check..?
> and why extra super user required for setOwner()? is the check required
> even in case of permissions disabled?
> Any idea on this..?
> Brahma Reddy Battula