I'm +1 for 1 more release in 2.8.x and declare that 2.8 is EoL. > would be even happier if we could move people to 2.9.x Agreed.
-Akira On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:59 PM Steve Loughran <ste...@cloudera.com.invalid> wrote: > > I'm in favour of 1 more release (it fixes the off-by 1 bug in > S3AInputStream HADOOP-16109), but would be even happier if we could move > people to 2.9.x > > maybe do a 2.9.x release and declare that 2.8 is EOL? > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 2:08 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang <weic...@apache.org> wrote: > > > My bad -- Didn't realize I was looking at the old Hadoop page. > > Here's the correct list of releases. > > https://hadoop.apache.org/releases.html > > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:49 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > IIRC we have a 2.8.5 release? > > > > > > On the download page: > > > > > > 2.8.5 2018 Sep 15 > > > > > > Wei-Chiu Chuang <weic...@apache.org> 于2019年7月25日周四 上午9:39写道： > > > > > > > The last 2.8 release (2.8.4) was made in the last May, more than a year > > > > ago. https://hadoop.apache.org/old/releases.html > > > > > > > > How do folks feel about the fate of branch-2.8? During the last > > community > > > > meetup in June, it sounds like most users are still on 2.8 or even 2.7, > > > so > > > > I don't think we want to abandon 2.8 just yet. > > > > > > > > I would personally want to urge folks to move up to 3.x, so I can stop > > > > cherrypicking stuff all the way down into 2.8. But it's not up to me > > > along > > > > to decide :) > > > > > > > > How do people feel about having another 2.8 release or two? I am not > > > saying > > > > I want to drive it, but I want to raise the awareness that folks are > > > still > > > > on 2.8 and there's not been an update for over a year. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
