+1 to close long pending PRs. I agree if the author is still interested to make progress the author can always reopen.
Regards, Uma On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 7:15 AM Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > > > On Aug 29, 2025, at 8:08 AM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > > > I don't really have a vote here, but I've been attempting to mentor some > folks on how to get engaged and the PR backlog is very daunting, and > signals that their contributions will get lost in the noise. So I'm in > favor of this. I recognize that it will cause some active PRs to be closed, > but this is a one-way door. > > Sorry, this is *NOT* a one-way door. Ie, easily reversed for tickets/PRs > that people still care about. > > — > Rich Bowen > rbo...@rcbowen.com > > > > >
