[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12796328#action_12796328
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-684:
--------------------------------

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12429357/HDFS-684.1.patch
  against trunk revision 894233.

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 7 new or modified tests.

    +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    -1 javac.  The patch appears to cause tar ant target to fail.

    +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.

    +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

    +1 core tests.  The patch passed core unit tests.

    -1 contrib tests.  The patch failed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/167/testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/167/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle results: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/167/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html
Console output: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/167/console

This message is automatically generated.

> Use HAR filesystem to merge parity files 
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-684
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-684
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: contrib/raid
>            Reporter: dhruba borthakur
>            Assignee: Rodrigo Schmidt
>         Attachments: HDFS-684.0.patch, HDFS-684.1.patch
>
>
> The HDFS raid implementation (HDFS-503) creates a parity file for every file 
> that is RAIDed. This puts additional burden on the memory requirements of the 
> namenode. It will be  nice if the parity files are combined together using 
> the HadoopArchive (har) format. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to