[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12803051#action_12803051
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-630:
--------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12430569/0001-Fix-HDFS-630-trunk-svn-4.patch
against trunk revision 901316.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 tests included. The patch appears to include 13 new or modified tests.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
+1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.
+1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.
-1 core tests. The patch failed core unit tests.
+1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/197/testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/197/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/197/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html
Console output:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/197/console
This message is automatically generated.
> In DFSOutputStream.nextBlockOutputStream(), the client can exclude specific
> datanodes when locating the next block.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-630
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-630
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: hdfs client, name-node
> Affects Versions: 0.21.0
> Reporter: Ruyue Ma
> Assignee: Cosmin Lehene
> Attachments: 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-0.21-svn-1.patch,
> 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-0.21-svn-2.patch, 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-0.21-svn.patch,
> 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-for-0.21-and-trunk-unified.patch,
> 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-for-0.21.patch, 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-svn.patch,
> 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-svn.patch, 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-trunk-svn-1.patch,
> 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-trunk-svn-2.patch, 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-trunk-svn-3.patch,
> 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-trunk-svn-3.patch, 0001-Fix-HDFS-630-trunk-svn-4.patch,
> hdfs-630-0.20.txt, HDFS-630.patch
>
>
> created from hdfs-200.
> If during a write, the dfsclient sees that a block replica location for a
> newly allocated block is not-connectable, it re-requests the NN to get a
> fresh set of replica locations of the block. It tries this
> dfs.client.block.write.retries times (default 3), sleeping 6 seconds between
> each retry ( see DFSClient.nextBlockOutputStream).
> This setting works well when you have a reasonable size cluster; if u have
> few datanodes in the cluster, every retry maybe pick the dead-datanode and
> the above logic bails out.
> Our solution: when getting block location from namenode, we give nn the
> excluded datanodes. The list of dead datanodes is only for one block
> allocation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
