[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860627#action_12860627
 ] 

Todd Lipcon commented on HDFS-1054:
-----------------------------------

I combined the log entries because I think the bad datanode should be INFO 
level. Would you prefer that I just change that message to INFO rather than 
combining them at the same time? Given that the abandonment is a direct result 
of the bad node, I think it makes more sense to have one message. Also, the 
node exclusion log is from HDFS-630 which hasn't been released yet, so I don't 
think we risk that anyone is parsing it.

> Remove unnecessary sleep after failure in nextBlockOutputStream
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-1054
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1054
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: hdfs client
>    Affects Versions: 0.22.0
>            Reporter: Todd Lipcon
>            Assignee: Todd Lipcon
>         Attachments: hdfs-1054.txt
>
>
> If DFSOutputStream fails to create a pipeline, it currently sleeps 6 seconds 
> before retrying. I don't see a great reason to wait at all, much less 6 
> seconds (especially now that HDFS-630 ensures that a retry won't go back to 
> the bad node). We should at least make it configurable, and perhaps something 
> like backoff makes some sense.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to