[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14193634#comment-14193634
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6735:
---------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12657297/HDFS-6735-v2.txt
against trunk revision 5c0381c.
{color:red}-1 patch{color}. The patch command could not apply the patch.
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/8624//console
This message is automatically generated.
> A minor optimization to avoid pread() be blocked by read() inside the same
> DFSInputStream
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-6735
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6735
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: hdfs-client
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Liang Xie
> Assignee: Liang Xie
> Attachments: HDFS-6735-v2.txt, HDFS-6735.txt
>
>
> In current DFSInputStream impl, there're a couple of coarser-grained locks in
> read/pread path, and it has became a HBase read latency pain point so far. In
> HDFS-6698, i made a minor patch against the first encourtered lock, around
> getFileLength, in deed, after reading code and testing, it shows still other
> locks we could improve.
> In this jira, i'll make a patch against other locks, and a simple test case
> to show the issue and the improved result.
> This is important for HBase application, since in current HFile read path, we
> issue all read()/pread() requests in the same DFSInputStream for one HFile.
> (Multi streams solution is another story i had a plan to do, but probably
> will take more time than i expected)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
