[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14196620#comment-14196620
 ] 

Haohui Mai commented on HDFS-6982:
----------------------------------

{code}
+    if (bucket.isStaleNow(time)) {
+      bucket.safeReset(time);
+    }
{code}

Maybe I'm missing something, but it looks like that it resets the bucket on 
every intervals, causing hiccups in the data. It might make more sense to use a 
decay function in this case:

{code}
bucket <- alpha * bucket + delta
{code}

Where 0 < alpha < 1. Assuming that the requests follow a Poisson distribution, 
you can calculate alpha w.r.t. each window based on the timespan of the delta.

> nntop: top­-like tool for name node users
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6982
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6982
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Maysam Yabandeh
>            Assignee: Maysam Yabandeh
>         Attachments: HDFS-6982.patch, HDFS-6982.v2.patch, HDFS-6982.v3.patch, 
> HDFS-6982.v4.patch, HDFS-6982.v5.patch, HDFS-6982.v6.patch, 
> nntop-design-v1.pdf
>
>
> In this jira we motivate the need for nntop, a tool that, similarly to what 
> top does in Linux, gives the list of top users of the HDFS name node and 
> gives insight about which users are sending majority of each traffic type to 
> the name node. This information turns out to be the most critical when the 
> name node is under pressure and the HDFS admin needs to know which user is 
> hammering the name node and with what kind of requests. Here we present the 
> design of nntop which has been in production at Twitter in the past 10 
> months. nntop proved to have low cpu overhead (< 2% in a cluster of 4K 
> nodes), low memory footprint (less than a few MB), and quite efficient for 
> the write path (only two hash lookup for updating a metric).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to