[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14217472#comment-14217472
 ] 

Arun Suresh commented on HDFS-5796:
-----------------------------------

[~benoyantony],
The old Web UI used to allow browser based access as a _dr.who_ user that could 
see/read world readable files irrespective of whether security was turned on or 
off. After HDFS-5382, this was not possible, since the the browser request was 
routed thru WebHDFS.. and on a secure cluster, WebHDFS required the client to 
be SPNEGO authenticated. This cannot be expected of a user's browser that is 
outside the cluster's security infrastructure and has no access to a KDC. Now 
HDFS-5716 allows one to configure a user specified filter for WebHDFS that can 
side step SPNEGO, but unfortunately this mean all requests from inside the 
secure cluster will also forgo SPNEGO authentication.

My patch was for a (IMO) middle ground where experience of users switching from 
the old Web UI is not severely degraded.. by allowing unauthenticated browser 
based access as the configured _HTTP_  kerberos principal. In any case, many 
browsers do not even support SPNEGO authentications, so authentication might 
not even be possible..

> The file system browser in the namenode UI requires SPNEGO.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-5796
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5796
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.5.0
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Assignee: Arun Suresh
>         Attachments: HDFS-5796.1.patch, HDFS-5796.1.patch
>
>
> After HDFS-5382, the browser makes webhdfs REST calls directly, requiring 
> SPNEGO to work between user's browser and namenode.  This won't work if the 
> cluster's security infrastructure is isolated from the regular network.  
> Moreover, SPNEGO is not supposed to be required for user-facing web pages.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to