[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14227031#comment-14227031
]
Lars Hofhansl commented on HDFS-6735:
-------------------------------------
Per my comment above my preference would still be to just make the
cachingStrategy reference volatile in DFSInputStream. It is immutable and hence
the volatile reference would make access safe in all cases without any locking
- the same is true for fileEncryptionInfo, btw (immutable already, just needs a
volatile reference, no locking needed at all).
I'll make a new patch.
> A minor optimization to avoid pread() be blocked by read() inside the same
> DFSInputStream
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-6735
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6735
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: hdfs-client
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Liang Xie
> Assignee: Liang Xie
> Attachments: HDFS-6735-v2.txt, HDFS-6735-v3.txt, HDFS-6735-v4.txt,
> HDFS-6735-v5.txt, HDFS-6735-v6.txt, HDFS-6735.txt
>
>
> In current DFSInputStream impl, there're a couple of coarser-grained locks in
> read/pread path, and it has became a HBase read latency pain point so far. In
> HDFS-6698, i made a minor patch against the first encourtered lock, around
> getFileLength, in deed, after reading code and testing, it shows still other
> locks we could improve.
> In this jira, i'll make a patch against other locks, and a simple test case
> to show the issue and the improved result.
> This is important for HBase application, since in current HFile read path, we
> issue all read()/pread() requests in the same DFSInputStream for one HFile.
> (Multi streams solution is another story i had a plan to do, but probably
> will take more time than i expected)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
