[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14246679#comment-14246679
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6425:
---------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12661072/HDFS-6425-2.patch
against trunk revision fae3e86.
{color:red}-1 patch{color}. The patch command could not apply the patch.
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/9037//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Large postponedMisreplicatedBlocks has impact on blockReport latency
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-6425
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6425
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ming Ma
> Assignee: Ming Ma
> Attachments: HDFS-6425-2.patch, HDFS-6425-Test-Case.pdf,
> HDFS-6425.patch
>
>
> Sometimes we have large number of over replicates when NN fails over. When
> the new active NN took over, over replicated blocks will be put to
> postponedMisreplicatedBlocks until all DNs for that block aren't stale
> anymore.
> We have a case where NNs flip flop. Before postponedMisreplicatedBlocks
> became empty, NN fail over again and again. So postponedMisreplicatedBlocks
> just kept increasing until the cluster is stable.
> In addition, large postponedMisreplicatedBlocks could make
> rescanPostponedMisreplicatedBlocks slow. rescanPostponedMisreplicatedBlocks
> takes write lock. So it could slow down the block report processing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
