[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14290072#comment-14290072
 ] 

Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze commented on HDFS-3107:
-------------------------------------------

There is a list of unresolved JIRAs.  Let's discuss it.
- HDFS-7341 Add initial snapshot support based on pipeline recovery
Is it still relevant?
- HDFS-7058 Tests for truncate CLI
Let's finish it before merging since CLI is user facing.  Is anyone working on 
it?
- HDFS-7655/HDFS-7656 Expose truncate API for Web HDFS/httpfs
It seems that we should not wait for them before merging.  Agree?
- HDFS-7659 We should check the new length of truncate can't be a negative value
Look like that this is going to be committed soon.
- HDFS-7665 Add definition of truncate preconditions/postconditions to 
filesystem specification
This is simple a documentation change.  Let's finish it before merging?

As a summary, how about finishing HDFS-7058, HDFS-7659 and HDFS-7665 before 
merging it to branch-2?


> HDFS truncate
> -------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-3107
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3107
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: datanode, namenode
>            Reporter: Lei Chang
>            Assignee: Plamen Jeliazkov
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-3107-13.patch, HDFS-3107-14.patch, 
> HDFS-3107-15.patch, HDFS-3107-HDFS-7056-combined.patch, HDFS-3107.008.patch, 
> HDFS-3107.15_branch2.patch, HDFS-3107.patch, HDFS-3107.patch, 
> HDFS-3107.patch, HDFS-3107.patch, HDFS-3107.patch, HDFS-3107.patch, 
> HDFS-3107.patch, HDFS-3107.patch, HDFS-3107.patch, HDFS-3107.patch, 
> HDFS-3107.patch, HDFS_truncate.pdf, HDFS_truncate.pdf, HDFS_truncate.pdf, 
> HDFS_truncate_semantics_Mar15.pdf, HDFS_truncate_semantics_Mar21.pdf, 
> editsStored, editsStored.xml
>
>   Original Estimate: 1,344h
>  Remaining Estimate: 1,344h
>
> Systems with transaction support often need to undo changes made to the 
> underlying storage when a transaction is aborted. Currently HDFS does not 
> support truncate (a standard Posix operation) which is a reverse operation of 
> append, which makes upper layer applications use ugly workarounds (such as 
> keeping track of the discarded byte range per file in a separate metadata 
> store, and periodically running a vacuum process to rewrite compacted files) 
> to overcome this limitation of HDFS.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to