[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14357683#comment-14357683
]
Daryn Sharp commented on HDFS-6658:
-----------------------------------
I've added many preconditions, not asserts, to avoid inconsistencies so it's
already self-checking in many cases (hopefully didn't ruin performance). Since
a storage iterator is based on a block, when removing a storage it will cross
check that the block id in the storage at the given offset actually matches the
iterator's block id. Same thing when replacing a value.
I was also thinking about adding a consistency checking thread, at least while
tests are running.
> Namenode memory optimization - Block replicas list
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-6658
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6658
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: namenode
> Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Reporter: Amir Langer
> Assignee: Daryn Sharp
> Attachments: BlockListOptimizationComparison.xlsx, BlocksMap
> redesign.pdf, HDFS-6658.patch, HDFS-6658.patch, HDFS-6658.patch, Namenode
> Memory Optimizations - Block replicas list.docx, New primative indexes.jpg,
> Old triplets.jpg
>
>
> Part of the memory consumed by every BlockInfo object in the Namenode is a
> linked list of block references for every DatanodeStorageInfo (called
> "triplets").
> We propose to change the way we store the list in memory.
> Using primitive integer indexes instead of object references will reduce the
> memory needed for every block replica (when compressed oops is disabled) and
> in our new design the list overhead will be per DatanodeStorageInfo and not
> per block replica.
> see attached design doc. for details and evaluation results.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
