[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14359352#comment-14359352
 ] 

Arpit Agarwal commented on HDFS-6666:
-------------------------------------

+1 from me too.

In the spirit of reducing redundant configuration, can we just assume block 
access tokens are enabled when security is on (even if the setting is 'off'')?

> Abort NameNode and DataNode startup if security is enabled but block access 
> token is not enabled.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6666
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6666
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: datanode, namenode, security
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 2.5.0
>            Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently, if security is enabled by setting hadoop.security.authentication 
> to kerberos, but HDFS block access tokens are disabled by setting 
> dfs.block.access.token.enable to false (which is the default), then the 
> NameNode logs an error and proceeds, and the DataNode proceeds without even 
> logging an error.  This jira proposes that this it's invalid to turn on 
> security but not turn on block access tokens, and that it would be better to 
> fail fast and abort the daemons during startup if this happens.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to