[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14364289#comment-14364289
 ] 

Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-7864:
---------------------------------

Thanks for updating the patch, Rui! Some comments for the latest patch:
# Actually we do not need {{DFS_NAMENODE_STRIPE_MIN_DEFAULT}}. For a striped
  block, the minimal safe number should depend on the EC schema of the
  individual block (i.e., the number of data blocks of a striped block group).
  Therefore we also need to update the logic of {{incrementSafeBlockCount}}.
# There are still multiple places not following the current project code 
convention. E.g., we need to put a space after each comma in the function 
parameter list.

> Erasure Coding: Update safemode calculation for striped blocks
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7864
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7864
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Jing Zhao
>            Assignee: GAO Rui
>         Attachments: HDFS-7864.1.patch, HDFS-7864.2.patch
>
>
> We need to update the safemode calculation for striped blocks. Specifically, 
> each striped block now consists of multiple data/parity blocks stored in 
> corresponding DataNodes. The current code's calculation is thus inconsistent: 
> each striped block is only counted as 1 expected block, while each of its 
> member block may increase the number of received blocks by 1.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to