[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14372295#comment-14372295
 ] 

Andrew Wang commented on HDFS-7960:
-----------------------------------

Reading through it again, few comments:

NNRpcServer:
* there's a TODO: FIXME, we aren't passing in the BlockReportContext. 
processReport doesn't need that last parameter anymore either I think, since 
the information is in the BR context.

BPServiceActor:
* Is there a need for BR ids to be monotonic increasing? Else using a random 
number seems better. I see you do a fixup by checking with the previous ID, but 
with random this shouldn't be necessary.

DatanodeDescriptor:
* it looks like we only get/set LastBlockReportId in removeZombieStorages. We 
need to be setting to the current BR id as BRs come in right? This is probably 
a holdover from processReport not being updated from the previous patch rev.

If you wanted to add comments about all this, BlockReportContext's class 
javadoc would be a good choice.

Nit:

{code}
    assert (namesystem.hasWriteLock());
{code}

space after assert

Going to stop there for now, I think we need to see another rev (the 
processReport FIXME basically) to get a feel for BlockReportContext.

> The full block report should prune zombie storages even if they're not empty
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7960
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7960
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>            Reporter: Lei (Eddy) Xu
>            Assignee: Colin Patrick McCabe
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: HDFS-7960.002.patch, HDFS-7960.003.patch, 
> HDFS-7960.004.patch
>
>
> The full block report should prune zombie storages even if they're not empty. 
>  We have seen cases in production where zombie storages have not been pruned 
> subsequent to HDFS-7575.  This could arise any time the NameNode thinks there 
> is a block in some old storage which is actually not there.  In this case, 
> the block will not show up in the "new" storage (once old is renamed to new) 
> and the old storage will linger forever as a zombie, even with the HDFS-7596 
> fix applied.  This also happens with datanode hotplug, when a drive is 
> removed.  In this case, an entire storage (volume) goes away but the blocks 
> do not show up in another storage on the same datanode.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to