[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14380405#comment-14380405
]
Hudson commented on HDFS-6353:
------------------------------
FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #7434 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/7434/])
Move HDFS-6353 to the trunk section in CHANGES.txt (jing9: rev
97e2aa2551338c9430b20fdd839deee49f6ea3c9)
* hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/CHANGES.txt
> Check and make checkpoint before stopping the NameNode
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-6353
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6353
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: namenode
> Reporter: Suresh Srinivas
> Assignee: Jing Zhao
> Fix For: 3.0.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-6353.000.patch, HDFS-6353.001.patch,
> HDFS-6353.002.patch
>
>
> One of the failure patterns I have seen is, in some rare circumstances, due
> to some inconsistency the secondary or standby fails to consume editlog. The
> only solution when this happens is to save the namespace at the current
> active namenode. But sometimes when this happens, unsuspecting admin might
> end up restarting the namenode, requiring more complicated solution to the
> problem (such as ignore editlog record that cannot be consumed etc.).
> How about adding the following functionality:
> When checkpointer (standby or secondary) fails to consume editlog, based on a
> configurable flag (on/off) to let the active namenode know about this
> failure. Active namenode can enters safemode and saves namespace. When in
> this type of safemode, namenode UI also shows information about checkpoint
> failure and that it is saving namespace. Once the namespace is saved,
> namenode can come out of safemode.
> This means service unavailability (even in HA cluster). But it might be worth
> it to avoid long startup times or need for other manual fixes. Thoughts?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
