[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yi Liu updated HDFS-8058:
-------------------------
Attachment: HDFS-8058.001.patch
Attach the patch.
In current logic, If file is striped, only
{{BlockInfoStriped/BlockInfoStripedUnderConstruction}} can be added into
{{BlockInfo[] blocks}}, and if file is contiguous, only
{{BlockInfoContiguous/BlockInfoContiguousUnderConstruction}} can be added. So
there is no problem doing like this.
[~jingzhao], [~zhz], please LMK what you think.
> Erasure coding: use BlockInfo[] for both striped and contiguous blocks in
> INodeFile
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-8058
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8058
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: HDFS-7285
> Reporter: Yi Liu
> Assignee: Yi Liu
> Attachments: HDFS-8058.001.patch
>
>
> This JIRA is to use {{BlockInfo[] blocks}} for both striped and contiguous
> blocks in INodeFile.
> Currently {{FileWithStripedBlocksFeature}} keeps separate list for striped
> blocks, and the methods there duplicate with those in INodeFile, and current
> code need to judge {{isStriped}} then do different things. Also if file is
> striped, the {{blocks}} in INodeFile occupy a reference memory space.
> These are not necessary, and we can use the same {{blocks}} to make code more
> clear.
> I keep {{FileWithStripedBlocksFeature}} as empty for follow use: I will file
> a new JIRA to move {{dataBlockNum}} and {{parityBlockNum}} to INodeFile,
> since ideally they are the same for all striped blocks in a file, and store
> them in block will waste NN memory.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)