[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14493715#comment-14493715
]
Kai Zheng commented on HDFS-8123:
---------------------------------
1. For somehow feeling maybe we could use {{erasurecoding}} instead of
{{erasurecode}} for the new proto file? How others would think?
2. It might not be good to have the following in the new proto file right now?
I'm not sure.
{code}
These .proto interfaces are private and stable.
{code}
[~vinayrpet], I'm not familiar with this aspect. Would you take a look at this
and give your comments? Thanks.
> Erasure Coding: Better to move EC related proto messages to a separate
> 'erasurecode.proto' file
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-8123
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8123
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Rakesh R
> Assignee: Rakesh R
> Attachments: HDFS-8123-001.patch, HDFS-8123-002.patch,
> HDFS-8123-003.patch
>
>
> While reviewing the code I've noticed EC related proto messages are getting
> added into {{hdfs.proto}}. IMHO, for better maintainability of the erasure
> code feature, its good to move this to a separate {{erasurecode.proto}} file.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
