[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14494982#comment-14494982
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-8078:
---------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12725086/HDFS-8078.patch
  against trunk revision fef596d.

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include 
any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this 
patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch.

      {color:red}-1 javac{color}.  The applied patch generated 1151 javac 
compiler warnings (more than the trunk's current 1150 warnings).

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  There were no new javadoc warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}.  The patch built with 
eclipse:eclipse.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/10275//testReport/
Javac warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/10275//artifact/patchprocess/diffJavacWarnings.txt
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/10275//console

This message is automatically generated.

> HDFS client gets errors trying to to connect to IPv6 DataNode
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-8078
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8078
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: hdfs-client
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>            Reporter: Nate Edel
>            Assignee: Nate Edel
>              Labels: ipv6
>         Attachments: HDFS-8078.patch
>
>
> 1st exception, on put:
> 15/03/23 18:43:18 WARN hdfs.DFSClient: DataStreamer Exception
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Does not contain a valid host:port 
> authority: 2401:db00:1010:70ba:face:0:8:0:50010
>       at org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.createSocketAddr(NetUtils.java:212)
>       at org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.createSocketAddr(NetUtils.java:164)
>       at org.apache.hadoop.net.NetUtils.createSocketAddr(NetUtils.java:153)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSOutputStream.createSocketForPipeline(DFSOutputStream.java:1607)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSOutputStream$DataStreamer.createBlockOutputStream(DFSOutputStream.java:1408)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSOutputStream$DataStreamer.nextBlockOutputStream(DFSOutputStream.java:1361)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.DFSOutputStream$DataStreamer.run(DFSOutputStream.java:588)
> Appears to actually stem from code in DataNodeID which assumes it's safe to 
> append together (ipaddr + ":" + port) -- which is OK for IPv4 and not OK for 
> IPv6.  NetUtils.createSocketAddr( ) assembles a Java URI object, which 
> requires the format proto://[2401:db00:1010:70ba:face:0:8:0]:50010
> Currently using InetAddress.getByName() to validate IPv6 (guava 
> InetAddresses.forString has been flaky) but could also use our own parsing. 
> (From logging this, it seems like a low-enough frequency call that the extra 
> object creation shouldn't be problematic, and for me the slight risk of 
> passing in bad input that is not actually an IPv4 or IPv6 address and thus 
> calling an external DNS lookup is outweighed by getting the address 
> normalized and avoiding rewriting parsing.)
> Alternatively, sun.net.util.IPAddressUtil.isIPv6LiteralAddress()
> -------
> 2nd exception (on datanode)
> 15/04/13 13:18:07 ERROR datanode.DataNode: 
> dev1903.prn1.facebook.com:50010:DataXceiver error processing unknown 
> operation  src: /2401:db00:20:7013:face:0:7:0:54152 dst: 
> /2401:db00:11:d010:face:0:2f:0:50010
> java.io.EOFException
>         at java.io.DataInputStream.readShort(DataInputStream.java:315)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.protocol.datatransfer.Receiver.readOp(Receiver.java:58)
>         at 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataXceiver.run(DataXceiver.java:226)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> Which also comes as client error "-get: 2401 is not an IP string literal."
> This one has existing parsing logic which needs to shift to the last colon 
> rather than the first.  Should also be a tiny bit faster by using lastIndexOf 
> rather than split.  Could alternatively use the techniques above.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to