[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14495517#comment-14495517
 ] 

Kai Zheng commented on HDFS-7859:
---------------------------------

bq.we don't know what to persist. For example, should we persist schema ID? We 
are not able to answer this question since we don't even know if a schema 
should have an ID.
It's not true. We have {{ECSchema}} defined and it uses schema name for the ID 
purpose. We would persist the whole schema object. The on-going work although 
isn't reflected in the design doc but we did do that following our related 
discussion. In the meetup with [~zhz] and [~jingzhao], we covered this aspect 
and even your questions already. It's my mistake I didn't put it down clearly 
and update the doc accordingly. 

> Erasure Coding: Persist EC schemas in NameNode
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7859
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7859
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Kai Zheng
>            Assignee: Xinwei Qin 
>         Attachments: HDFS-7859.001.patch
>
>
> In meetup discussion with [~zhz] and [~jingzhao], it's suggested that we 
> persist EC schemas in NameNode centrally and reliably, so that EC zones can 
> reference them by name efficiently.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to