[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14498613#comment-14498613
]
Akira AJISAKA commented on HDFS-6153:
-------------------------------------
bq. Actually, I think we should revert the patch since fileId and childrenNum
are only in HdfsFileStatus but not FileStatus.
I'm okay to revert this patch. However, I'm thinking it would be better for
users to document the fields as optional, such as symlink field. What do you
think?
> Document "fileId" and "childrenNum" fields in the FileStatus Json schema
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-6153
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6153
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: documentation, webhdfs
> Affects Versions: 2.3.0
> Reporter: Akira AJISAKA
> Assignee: Akira AJISAKA
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: newbie
> Fix For: 2.5.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-6153.patch, HDFS-6153.patch
>
>
> Now WebHDFS returns FileStatus Json objects include "fileId" and
> "childrenNum" fields but these fields are not documented.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
