[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14505653#comment-14505653
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-8207:
---------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12726912/HDFS-8207.patch
against trunk revision 8ddbb8d.
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests in
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs:
org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestEditLog
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/10333//testReport/
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/10333//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Improper log mesage when blockreport interval comapred with initial delay
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-8207
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8207
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Brahma Reddy Battula
> Assignee: Brahma Reddy Battula
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HDFS-8207.patch, Hadoop-8253.patch, Hadoop-8253.patch
>
>
> Log message is telling if initialDelay is more than blockReportInterval
> setting to 0.
> But actuall check is greaterthan and equal..like following..It is misleading
> initail I thought if it
> is equal then initailBr wn't set to zero.
> {code}
> if (initBRDelay >= blockReportInterval) {
> initBRDelay = 0;
> DataNode.LOG.info("dfs.blockreport.initialDelay is greater than " +
> "dfs.blockreport.intervalMsec." + " Setting initial delay to 0
> msec:");
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
