[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14508715#comment-14508715
 ] 

Hudson commented on HDFS-4448:
------------------------------

FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #7645 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/7645/])
HDFS-4448. Allow HA NN to start in secure mode with wildcard address configured 
(atm via asuresh) (Arun Suresh: rev baf8bc6c488de170d2caf76d9fa4c99faaa8f1a6)
* 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/DFSUtil.java
* hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/CHANGES.txt


> Allow HA NN to start in secure mode with wildcard address configured
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-4448
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4448
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ha, namenode, security
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.3-alpha
>            Reporter: Aaron T. Myers
>            Assignee: Aaron T. Myers
>             Fix For: 2.8.0
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-4448.2.patch, HDFS-4448.patch, HDFS-4448.patch
>
>
> Currently if one tries to configure HA NNs use the wildcard HTTP address when 
> security is enabled, the NN will fail to start with an error like the 
> following:
> {code}
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: java.io.IOException: Cannot use a 
> wildcard address with security. Must explicitly set bind address for Kerberos
> {code}
> This is the case even if one configures an actual address for the other NN's 
> HTTP address. There's no good reason for this, since we now check for the 
> local address being set to 0.0.0.0 and determine the canonical hostname for 
> Kerberos purposes using 
> {{InetAddress.getLocalHost().getCanonicalHostName()}}, so we should remove 
> the restriction.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to