[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14511889#comment-14511889
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-8248:
---------------------------------

\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | patch |   0m  0s | The patch command could not apply 
the patch during dryrun. |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Patch URL | 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12728063/HDFS-8248.000.patch |
| Optional Tests | javadoc javac unit findbugs checkstyle |
| git revision | trunk / 78fe6e5 |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/10379/console |


This message was automatically generated.

> Store INodeId instead of the INodeFile object in BlockInfoContiguous
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-8248
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8248
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Haohui Mai
>            Assignee: Haohui Mai
>         Attachments: HDFS-8248.000.patch
>
>
> Currently the namespace and the block manager are tightly coupled together. 
> There are two couplings in terms of implementation:
> 1. The {{BlockInfoContiguous}} stores a reference of the {{INodeFile}} that 
> owns the block, so that the block manager can look up the corresponding file 
> when replicating blocks, recovering from pipeline failures, etc.
> 1. The {{INodeFile}} stores {{BlockInfoContiguous}} objects that the file 
> owns.
> Decoupling the namespace and the block manager allows the BM to be separated 
> out from the Java heap or even as a standalone process. This jira proposes to 
> remove the first coupling by storing the id of the inode instead of the 
> object reference of {{INodeFile}} in the {{BlockInfoContiguous}} class.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to