[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14524722#comment-14524722
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-5357:
---------------------------------

\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | patch |   0m  0s | The patch command could not apply 
the patch during dryrun. |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Patch URL | 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12608332/HDFS-5357v1.patch |
| Optional Tests | javac unit findbugs checkstyle |
| git revision | trunk / f1a152c |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/10572/console |


This message was automatically generated.

> TestFileSystemAccessService failures in JDK7
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-5357
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5357
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.23.9
>            Reporter: Robert Parker
>            Assignee: Robert Parker
>         Attachments: HDFS-5357v1.patch
>
>
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Expected Exception: ServiceException 
> got: ExceptionInInitializerError
>       at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:47)
>       at 
> org.apache.hadoop.test.TestExceptionHelper$1.evaluate(TestExceptionHelper.java:56)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runNotIgnored(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:79)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:71)
>       at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:49)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:193)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:52)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:191)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:42)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:184)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:236)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:264)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:153)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:124)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray2(ReflectionUtils.java:208)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:159)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:87)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:153)
>       at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:95)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to