[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Nauroth updated HDFS-7608:
--------------------------------
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
[~esteban], thank you for rebasing, but this patch cannot be committed. As I
described here, it would potentially change the existing behavior much more
than intended.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7608?focusedCommentId=14314868&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14314868
I'm clicking Cancel Patch to make it clearer that this patch isn't ready.
> hdfs dfsclient newConnectedPeer has no write timeout
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-7608
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7608
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: fuse-dfs, hdfs-client
> Affects Versions: 2.6.0, 2.3.0
> Environment: hdfs 2.3.0 hbase 0.98.6
> Reporter: zhangshilong
> Assignee: Xiaoyu Yao
> Labels: BB2015-05-TBR, patch
> Attachments: HDFS-7608.0.patch, HDFS-7608.1.patch, HDFS-7608.2.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 24h
> Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> problem:
> hbase compactSplitThread may lock forever on read datanode blocks.
> debug found: epollwait timeout set to 0,so epollwait can not run out.
> cause: in hdfs 2.3.0
> hbase using DFSClient to read and write blocks.
> DFSClient creates one socket using newConnectedPeer(addr), but has no read
> or write timeout.
> in v 2.6.0, newConnectedPeer has added readTimeout to deal with the
> problem,but did not add writeTimeout. why did not add write Timeout?
> I think NioInetPeer need a default socket timeout,so appalications will no
> need to force adding timeout by themselives.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
