[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14553839#comment-14553839
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6440:
---------------------------------

\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | patch |   0m  0s | The patch command could not apply 
the patch during dryrun. |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Patch URL | 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12734365/hdfs-6440-trunk-v4.patch
 |
| Optional Tests | javadoc javac unit findbugs checkstyle |
| git revision | trunk / fb6b38d |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/11079/console |


This message was automatically generated.

> Support more than 2 NameNodes
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6440
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6440
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: auto-failover, ha, namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.0
>            Reporter: Jesse Yates
>            Assignee: Jesse Yates
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: Multiple-Standby-NameNodes_V1.pdf, 
> hdfs-6440-cdh-4.5-full.patch, hdfs-6440-trunk-v1.patch, 
> hdfs-6440-trunk-v1.patch, hdfs-6440-trunk-v3.patch, hdfs-6440-trunk-v4.patch, 
> hdfs-multiple-snn-trunk-v0.patch
>
>
> Most of the work is already done to support more than 2 NameNodes (one 
> active, one standby). This would be the last bit to support running multiple 
> _standby_ NameNodes; one of the standbys should be available for fail-over.
> Mostly, this is a matter of updating how we parse configurations, some 
> complexity around managing the checkpointing, and updating a whole lot of 
> tests.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to