[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Chris Nauroth updated HDFS-8432:
--------------------------------
    Attachment: HDFS-8432.002.patch

[~arpitagarwal] pointed out to me that I had set some wrong values for the 
minimum compatible layout versions.  {{TRUNCATE}} was added in Apache Hadoop 
2.7.0 as layout version -61.  We need to set its minimum compatible layout 
version to -61.  (Setting it to itself means it is not downgradeable to any 
prior versions.)  By extension, we also need to set {{APPEND_NEW_BLOCK}} and 
{{QUOTA_BY_STORAGE_TYPE}} to minimum compatible layout version -61.  Those 
features also shipped in Apache Hadoop 2.7.0, so it wouldn't make sense to 
claim those features are downgradeable to any pre-truncate version.

Thank you for the review, Arpit.  Here is patch v002.  I also addressed the 
Jenkins feedback from the last run.

> Introduce a minimum compatible layout version to allow downgrade in more 
> rolling upgrade use cases.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-8432
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8432
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: namenode, rolling upgrades
>            Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>            Assignee: Chris Nauroth
>         Attachments: HDFS-8432-HDFS-Downgrade-Extended-Support.pdf, 
> HDFS-8432.001.patch, HDFS-8432.002.patch
>
>
> Maintain the prior layout version during the upgrade window and reject 
> attempts to use new features until after the upgrade has been finalized.  
> This guarantees that the prior software version can read the fsimage and edit 
> logs if the administrator decides to downgrade.  This will make downgrade 
> usable for the majority of NameNode layout version changes, which just 
> involve introduction of new edit log operations.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to