[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14598802#comment-14598802
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-8656:
---------------------------------

\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | patch |   0m  0s | The patch command could not apply 
the patch during dryrun. |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Patch URL | 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12741418/hdfs-8656.001.patch |
| Optional Tests | javadoc javac unit findbugs checkstyle |
| git revision | trunk / 49dfad9 |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/11457/console |


This message was automatically generated.

> Preserve compatibility of ClientProtocol#rollingUpgrade after finalization
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-8656
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8656
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: rolling upgrades
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>            Reporter: Andrew Wang
>            Assignee: Andrew Wang
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: hdfs-8656.001.patch
>
>
> HDFS-7645 changed rollingUpgradeInfo to still return an RUInfo after 
> finalization, so the DNs can differentiate between rollback and a 
> finalization. However, this breaks compatibility for the user facing APIs, 
> which always expect a null after finalization. Let's fix this and edify it in 
> unit tests.
> As an additional improvement, isFinalized and isStarted are part of the Java 
> API, but not in the JMX output of RollingUpgradeInfo. It'd be nice to expose 
> these booleans so JMX users don't need to do the != 0 check that possibly 
> exposes our implementation details.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to