[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14614700#comment-14614700
]
Takanobu Asanuma commented on HDFS-8620:
----------------------------------------
Thanks for the comment, [~wheat9]!
OK, I will remove subclasses of IOException from the throws list. And please
let me ask one more question. Should we remove the import statements which are
for subclasses of IOException? If we remove them, checkstyle issues arise. If
not, we need to complete the passes of the classes in the javadoc comments.
Which do you think is better?
> Clean up the checkstyle warinings about ClientProtocol
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-8620
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8620
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Takanobu Asanuma
> Assignee: Takanobu Asanuma
> Attachments: HDFS-8620.1.patch, HDFS-8620.2.patch, HDFS-8620.3.patch
>
>
> These warnings were generated in HDFS-8238.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
