[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14715439#comment-14715439
 ] 

Daniel Templeton commented on HDFS-2896:
----------------------------------------

The comment in the 2NN that the checkpoint thread should never end has been 
removed, presumably as it's no longer relevant.  The checkpoint thread is still 
a daemon thread, but since the main thread joins on the checkpoint thread, I 
don't see where it impacts anything.  The 2NN appears to now be consistent with 
the NN: in both, the main method launches a thread and then joins it.

Sounds like this JIRA was a causality of HDFS-4426.  Anyone against closing it?

> The 2NN incorrectly daemonizes
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-2896
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2896
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 0.23.0, 2.0.0-alpha
>            Reporter: Eli Collins
>              Labels: newbie
>
> The SecondaryNameNode (and Checkpointer) confuse o.a.h.u.Daemon with a Unix 
> daemon. Per below it intends to create a thread that never ends, but 
> o.a.h.u.Daemon just marks a thread with Java's Thread#setDaemon which means 
> Java will terminate the thread when there are no more non-daemon user threads 
> running
> {code}
>     // Create a never ending deamon
>     Daemon checkpointThread = new Daemon(secondary);
> {code}
> Perhaps they thought they were using commons Daemon. We of course don't want 
> the 2NN to exit unless it exits itself or is stopped explicitly. Currently it 
> won't do this because the main thread is not marked as a daemon thread. In 
> any case, let's make the 2NN consistent with the NN in this regard (exit when 
> the RPC thread exits).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to