[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mingliang Liu updated HDFS-8971:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
We moved the {{shortcircuit}} package from {{hadoop-hdfs}} to 
{{hadoop-hdfs-client}} module in JIRA 
[HDFS-8934|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8934] and 
[HDFS-8951|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8951]. Meanwhile, we also 
replaced the _log4j_ log with _slf4j_ logger. There were existing code in the 
{{shortcircuit}} package to guard the log when calling {{LOG.debug()}} and 
{{LOG.trace()}}, e.g. in {{ShortCircuitCache.java}}, we have code like this:
{code}
724    if (LOG.isTraceEnabled()) {
725      LOG.trace(this + ": found waitable for " + key);
726    }
{code}

In _slf4j_, this kind of guard is not necessary. We should clean the code by 
removing the guard.

  was:This jira tracks the effort of moving the {{ShortCircuitShm}} class into 
the hdfs-client module.


> Remove guards when calling LOG.debug() and LOG.trace() in slf4j
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-8971
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8971
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: build
>            Reporter: Mingliang Liu
>            Assignee: Mingliang Liu
>             Fix For: 2.8.0
>
>
> We moved the {{shortcircuit}} package from {{hadoop-hdfs}} to 
> {{hadoop-hdfs-client}} module in JIRA 
> [HDFS-8934|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8934] and 
> [HDFS-8951|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8951]. Meanwhile, we 
> also replaced the _log4j_ log with _slf4j_ logger. There were existing code 
> in the {{shortcircuit}} package to guard the log when calling {{LOG.debug()}} 
> and {{LOG.trace()}}, e.g. in {{ShortCircuitCache.java}}, we have code like 
> this:
> {code}
> 724    if (LOG.isTraceEnabled()) {
> 725      LOG.trace(this + ": found waitable for " + key);
> 726    }
> {code}
> In _slf4j_, this kind of guard is not necessary. We should clean the code by 
> removing the guard.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to