[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14718343#comment-14718343
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-8988:
---------------------------------

\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | pre-patch |  16m 32s | Findbugs (version ) appears to 
be broken on trunk. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | @author |   0m  0s | The patch does not contain any 
@author tags. |
| {color:red}-1{color} | tests included |   0m  0s | The patch doesn't appear 
to include any new or modified tests.  Please justify why no new tests are 
needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | javac |   8m  0s | There were no new javac warning 
messages. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | javadoc |  10m 10s | There were no new javadoc 
warning messages. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | release audit |   0m 25s | The applied patch does 
not increase the total number of release audit warnings. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | checkstyle |   0m 31s | There were no new checkstyle 
issues. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | whitespace |   0m  0s | The patch has no lines that 
end in whitespace. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | install |   1m 42s | mvn install still works. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | eclipse:eclipse |   0m 33s | The patch built with 
eclipse:eclipse. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | findbugs |   2m 31s | The patch does not introduce 
any new Findbugs (version 3.0.0) warnings. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | native |   3m 15s | Pre-build of native portion |
| {color:red}-1{color} | hdfs tests | 188m 53s | Tests failed in hadoop-hdfs. |
| | | 232m 35s | |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed unit tests | 
hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.TestLazyPersistFiles |
|   | hadoop.hdfs.TestRollingUpgrade |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Patch URL | 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12752942/HDFS-8988.001.patch |
| Optional Tests | javadoc javac unit findbugs checkstyle |
| git revision | trunk / e166c03 |
| hadoop-hdfs test log | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/12192/artifact/patchprocess/testrun_hadoop-hdfs.txt
 |
| Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/12192/testReport/ |
| Java | 1.7.0_55 |
| uname | Linux asf909.gq1.ygridcore.net 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP 
PREEMPT Wed Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/12192/console |


This message was automatically generated.

> Use LightWeightHashSet instead of LightWeightLinkedSet in 
> BlockManager#excessReplicateMap
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-8988
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8988
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Yi Liu
>            Assignee: Yi Liu
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HDFS-8988.001.patch
>
>
> {code}
> public final Map<String, LightWeightLinkedSet<Block>> excessReplicateMap = 
> new HashMap<>();
> {code}
> {{LightWeightLinkedSet}} extends {{LightWeightHashSet}} and keeps elements in 
> order, but it requires more memory for each entry (2 references = 8 bytes).  
> We don't need to keep excess replicated blocks in order here, so should use  
> {{LightWeightHashSet}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to