[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14904865#comment-14904865
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-9100:
---------------------------------

\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | pre-patch |  17m 55s | Pre-patch trunk compilation is 
healthy. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | @author |   0m  0s | The patch does not contain any 
@author tags. |
| {color:red}-1{color} | tests included |   0m  0s | The patch doesn't appear 
to include any new or modified tests.  Please justify why no new tests are 
needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to 
verify this patch. |
| {color:red}-1{color} | javac |   7m 58s | The applied patch generated  2  
additional warning messages. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | javadoc |  10m 12s | There were no new javadoc 
warning messages. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | release audit |   0m 25s | The applied patch does 
not increase the total number of release audit warnings. |
| {color:red}-1{color} | checkstyle |   1m 25s | The applied patch generated  1 
new checkstyle issues (total was 46, now 47). |
| {color:red}-1{color} | whitespace |   0m  0s | The patch has 1  line(s) that 
end in whitespace. Use git apply --whitespace=fix. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | install |   1m 31s | mvn install still works. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | eclipse:eclipse |   0m 35s | The patch built with 
eclipse:eclipse. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | findbugs |   2m 32s | The patch does not introduce 
any new Findbugs (version 3.0.0) warnings. |
| {color:green}+1{color} | native |   3m 20s | Pre-build of native portion |
| {color:red}-1{color} | hdfs tests | 193m 30s | Tests failed in hadoop-hdfs. |
| | | 239m 27s | |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed unit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestFileTruncate |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Patch URL | 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12761884/HDFS-9100.000.patch |
| Optional Tests | javadoc javac unit findbugs checkstyle |
| git revision | trunk / a2c76e5 |
| javac | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/12622/artifact/patchprocess/diffJavacWarnings.txt
 |
| checkstyle |  
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/12622/artifact/patchprocess/diffcheckstylehadoop-hdfs.txt
 |
| whitespace | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/12622/artifact/patchprocess/whitespace.txt
 |
| hadoop-hdfs test log | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/12622/artifact/patchprocess/testrun_hadoop-hdfs.txt
 |
| Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/12622/testReport/ |
| Java | 1.7.0_55 |
| uname | Linux asf909.gq1.ygridcore.net 3.13.0-36-lowlatency #63-Ubuntu SMP 
PREEMPT Wed Sep 3 21:56:12 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/12622/console |


This message was automatically generated.

> HDFS Balancer does not respect dfs.client.use.datanode.hostname
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-9100
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9100
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: balancer & mover, HDFS
>            Reporter: Yongjun Zhang
>            Assignee: Casey Brotherton
>         Attachments: HDFS-9100.000.patch
>
>
> In Balancer Dispatch.java:
> {code}
>    private void dispatch() {
>       LOG.info("Start moving " + this);
>       Socket sock = new Socket();
>       DataOutputStream out = null;
>       DataInputStream in = null;
>       try {
>         sock.connect(
>             NetUtils.createSocketAddr(target.getDatanodeInfo().getXferAddr()),
>             HdfsConstants.READ_TIMEOUT);
> {code}
> getXferAddr() is called without taking into consideration of 
> dfs.client.use.datanode.hostname setting, this would possibly fail balancer 
> run issued from outside a cluster.
> Thanks [~caseyjbrotherton] for reporting the issue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to